posted 10/07/09 02:24 PM | updated 10/07/09 02:24 PM
Featured Post! | Views: 1461 | Comments : 6 | Elections

New poll: Eyman initiative and gay domestic partnership initiative leads

The latest KING5/Survey USA poll shows Tim Eyman's Initiative 1033 -- with would limit spending for state and local governments -- leading 45 percent to 32 percent.

The poll showed that Referendum 71, which would affirm the state's new domestic partnership law for gay couples was leading --slightly. The KING5/Survey USA poll found that 45 percent of likely voters were certain to vote for the referendum, while 42 percent were certain to reject it. Another 13 percent were uncertain.

The pollster noted that despite the Eyman initiative's lead 22 percent of respondents are undecided, and "any outcome remains possible."

"Typically, opposition to ballot measures builds as Election Day approaches. This is especially true when a ballot measure seeks to spend taxpayer money. In the present case, Initiative 1033 seeks to limit the spending of taxpayer money, so the general rule may or may not apply. Further: all-mail voting in Washington State, which begins when ballots are mailed in mid-October, makes the concept of an "Election Day" less meaningful," SurveyUSA said.

According to the poll, the initiative is supported by three of four conservatives, two of three Republicans, and by a two-to-one margin among Independents. Liberals and Democrats are opposed by a two-to-one margin.

The poll found a gender gap in the domestic partnership measure. Men rejected it by a four-point margin, while women supported it by 12 points.

The poll also found wide disparities between parties and between residents of Western and Eastern Washington.

It found that  72 percent of Republicans saying they will vote to reject while 72 percent of Democrats said they will support it.

Survey USA said: In Metro Seattle, the measure is approved by 18 points; in Eastern Washington, it is rejected by 18 points. Western Washington voters outside of Metro Seattle are more divided, with an 8-point margin voting against the referendum.

Save and Share this article
Tags:
Polls, polls, so many polls
On September 22nd, a Rasmussen poll of I-1033's ballot title (This measure would limit growth of certain state, county and city revenue to annual inflation and population growth, not including voter-approved revenue increases. Revenue collected above the limit would reduce property tax levies) among 500 likely voters showed it at 61% yes, 31% no, 8% undecided. That's a 30 point lead with just a few weeks to go. YIPPEE!!!

Today, KING 5's SURVEYUSA had these results among likely voters: 45% yes, 32% no, 22% no certain. But they didn't read voters I-1033's ballot title, instead they asked "Initiative 1033 would limit spending for state, county, and local governments." So without being told that I-1033 lowers property taxes, that I-1033 allows governments to grow at inflation and population growth, that I-1033 allows bigger increases with voter approval -- all information that's in I-1033's ballot title -- even so, I-1033's way ahead.

Stuart Elway's poll, which consistently understates the level of support our initiatives receive on election day, has I-1033's ballot title results at 46% yes, 22% no, 32% undecided (don't forget, those undecided's gotta go somewhere).

So while opponents spend millions of Washington DC's dirty dollars spreading their threats, lies, and scare tactics, they're clearly in a hole.

In 12 years, I've never seen an initiative that fits the times as well as Initiative 1033 does. Voters seem especially eager to send a message of fiscal discipline to the politicians.
Comment by Tim Eyman, I-1033 co-sponsor
5 months ago
( 0 votes)
Eyman Initiative 1033 Losing Support
Several polls now have put I-1033 below 50%. These are all before the No on I-1033 campaign begins its media campaign. The more people learn about what I-1033 really does, not Tim Eyman's hype and misleading ballot title, the fewer people who support it.

I-1033 proposes far reaching changes to state and local tax policy and governance. Here are three reasons why to vote NO on Initiative 1033.

1. It would freeze state and local spending of tax dollars at the current recession level. The only way to restore this year's cuts due to the recession or increase any other services would be by public votes. Elections for budgets cost money, delay action and open the process up to campaign spending and politics by sound bites.

2. It would abolish the current power of our state and local elected officials to vote to fund any new or expanded services over the baseline level set by the initiative by taking away this power and requiring budgeting by referendum. It would change representative government as we have known it since statehood for the state and all 39 counties and 281 cities.

3. Initiative 1033 is a complex wealth transfer scheme that takes sales taxes and other fees collected from everyone and only uses them to pay property taxes for property owners. Last year some 54% of state revenue came from sales taxes.

The problem with I-1033 is that not everyone owns property. Some 35% of households in the state are not owner occupied according to the US Census Bureau. Renters, whether they are fixed income seniors or working families, lose twice under I-1033; they will get no tax rebate and will also see no restored or new services for the tax dollars they paid.

Also one third of the tax transfer goes to commercial real estate. Under I-1033 sales tax dollars collected from people that don't own property would be used to help wealthy property owners like malls and corporations and real estate developers pay their property taxes. This is wrong. It would put even more of the tax burden on lower incomes folks.

Eyman's Initiative 1033 says paying property taxes for wealthy property owners is more important than educating our kids, fixing roads, health care for seniors and children, keeping parks and libraries open, police and fire protection and any other public services now provided.

I-1033 is a terrible idea and is not needed. Vote No on I-1033!
Comment by Steve Zemke MajorityRulesBlog
5 months ago
( 0 votes)
Anti-Commoner Initiative
The Party of Commons strongly opposes this initiative. This is an anti-unemployed workers, anti-commoner, anti-poor, anti-renters, anti-dispossessed & forgotten people and anti-low salaried workers initiative. This would make Washington 50th in the nation in just about everything involving health, education and social services, while the pool of "indentured servants" for the corporate behemoth would rise.
Comment by Mark Greene
5 months ago
( 0 votes)
Ill-Advised Initiative 1033
P.S.

"Commons" will tell as many as people as possible about this state government de-funding, anti-commoner and ill-advised initiative 1033, including talking to people at our forums and writing about it on our blogs.

http://commonsouth.blogspot.com
Comment by Mark Greene
5 months ago
( 0 votes)
Bad Idea
We're seeing California struggling after it has initiated itself to death. Colorado voted down their TABOR (which 1033 is modeled after) after they saw the disaster it wrought on their state. Washington needs to sit up and realize that Eyman's latest initiative is a BAD idea. Come on: this is a novelty watch salesman setting taxation policy? In what world is that a good idea?
Comment by Gordian
4 months ago
( 0 votes)
Affirm all families
Religious conservatives have repeatedly claimed they love the gays, and just can't bear them using the word marriage.
THEY LIED.
They have shown NO HUMAN RIGHTS for LGBTs is their agenda.
No protections for hate crimes, No protections for employment or housing, and No protection for Domestic Partners.
Please affirm ALL Washington families....vote yes on ref 71
Comment by mark swaney
4 months ago
( 0 votes)
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: