Fish farms, low oxygen levels and wild salmon: A troubled coexistence

In conjunction with KBCS, we’re posting a transcript of Martha Baskin’s latest story. Listen to her radio story here:

With fish resources depleted worldwide, open water and offshore fish farming or aquaculture is seen by some as a way to increase fish production. Washington State has been a leading producer of aquaculture for over a century. But what are the impacts to wild fish resources and the environment?

Martha Baskin visited a fish farm on Bainbridge Island and tells us all about it:

Fort Ward, Bainbridge IslandAmerican Gold Seafoods, a subsidiary of Icicle Seafoods, raises Atlantic salmon in a fish farm here. With fish resources depleted worldwide, open water and offshore fish farming is seen by some as a way to increase fish production. But it’s controversial.

American Gold Seafoods wouldn’t go on record for this story. By chance I meet an environmental educator, Cara Cruikshank, who lives near the farm. Together we pay a visit. Site manager Alec Coltus knows Cruikshank and answers basic questions.

“All the fish are raised in our hatcheries in Rochester, Wash. We bring about 1.5 million fish down here and stock our site,” Coltus says.

I ask what’s in the white bags of feed being unloaded.

“Fish meal. Sardines. Anchovies. Some land-based by-products. Soy. Chicken. Corn.”

And this has been going on for 20 years?

“Thirty-seven, no thirty-eight,” Coltus replies. A Norwegian company started the fish farm with a few test pens.

How many do you estimate you have today?

“We have 54 pens down here. Each pen holds anywhere from 20,000 to 32,000 fish,” Coltus says.

It’s the fecal waste produced by these penned Atlantic salmon that concerns Cruikshank the most. But the practice of feeding farmed fish wild fish ranks equally high. Cruikshank says the fish farm was originally sited on Bainbridge Island’s Rich Passage because of the strong current and good flush.

“So what these fish are doing is their waste is going right into that great flush. It’s carrying their waste all over the island. All over Puget Sound,” Cruikshank says. “And Puget Sound doesn’t flush well. It’s like a bathtub, as Christine Gregoire said.”

The salmon pens are to be relocated across Rich Passage to Clam Bay near Manchester. Residents recently convinced Kitsap County officials that heavy trucks going to and from the salmon farm were a hazard. Water pollution didn’t come up, says Cruikshank.

“No one really understands the extent of the problem coming from the few fish farms we have in Washington. It’s millions of pounds of waste annually,” Cruikshank says. “Untreated waste.”

Dr. Christopher Krembs, senior oceanographer of the Marine Monitoring Unit in the Department of Ecology’s Environment Assessment Program, monitors water quality. He says fecal matter and feed waste are factors in Puget Sound’s increase in nutrient concentration over the last 10 years. Nutrients foster algae growth. And when algae blooms die they attract bacteria to decompose it. “That takes oxygen,” Krembs says.

 

“What we found in Puget Sound is that concentrations in oxygen throughout the entire region are beginning to decline,” Krembs says. “So there’s a relation between the increase in nutrients and the decrease in oxygen.”

Nutrients aren’t bad by themselves, says Krembs, but their quantity and balance are. Fish farms can be compared to a fish tank. The art is to feed the fish only as much as they can eat within a few minutes.

 

   (Pictured: Algae bloom in Clark County, Wash.)

“You want to prevent any of the fish food sinking down to the bottom. Because when that happens you have water quality in your fish tank that is really bad,” he says. “So with fish aquaculture you have a similar situation.”

Krembs says raising fish in dense concentrations can also lead to disease. “Normally a school of fish swims and sort of changes the water that it’s swimming in all the time. But here you have them really incubating in a very narrow space.”

Does this mean the state should discontinue fish farming?

No, concludes Krembs. Instead it depends on how often the fish are fed, and how many cages and companies operate from one site. American Gold Seafoods will increase operations by 50 percent when it relocates from Bainbridge Island to Clam Bay.

Anne Mosness fished in Alaska for 28 years. We meet at Fisherman’s Terminal. She’s an organizer with the “Go Wild Campaign,” a nonprofit that works to save wild salmon. The campaign is firmly against fish farming. “I created the ‘Go Wild Campaign,’” she says, “because of my long history with fishing and the extraordinary health benefits of wild fish and the value of the small family fishing businesses to the economy along the coastlines of the country.”

Mosness regularly testifies before the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration or NOAA, which favor fish farming, also known as aquaculture, to replenish stock. NOAA held public hearings this spring about their goal to expand “sustainable aquaculture.” Mosness was there.

Of the issues that concern her most, one is the number of farmed salmon that escape.

“The salmon pens in Washington had an outbreak of hemmorhagic septicemia several winters ago. These open-sided cages are incapable of confining pollution and parasites and these pathogens or even the actual fish. They’re causing harm to wild species we’re obligated to protect under the public trust doctrine.” Mosness calls it a choice between feedlots or family farms. “And I think that’s the issue we need to look at. Are we replicating the worst problems of factory farms on land in our marine environment?”

 

  (Pictured: Visible effects of hemorrhagic septicemia)


Since 2005 there have been a number of national bills introduced into Congress which would allow ocean fish farming in federal waters. None have made it out of committee. We’ll continue to explore farmed vs. wild fish resources over the next few weeks. Are there sustainable options for consumers? Why does the country export as much seafood as it imports?

 

**

OTHER FOOD FEATURES…

Sustainable Oceans, Sustainable Fish: Market strategies and consumer demand

 

Industry fishing for profits, not predators, UW reports

 

3 Responses to Fish farms, low oxygen levels and wild salmon: A troubled coexistence

  • Noreen Parks:

    Your article states that WA is a leading producer of aquacultured fish, but also includes this quote: “No one really understands the extent of the problem coming from the few fish farms we have in Washington. It’s millions of pounds of waste annually,” Cruikshank says. “Untreated waste.”

    How many aq facilities are there state-wide? Are they all situated on the Sound? Does Ecology monitor the environmental effects of their operations?

  • Larry Dominguez, Cramer Fish S:

    Always distinguish between finfish and shellfish when referring to the industry, in 2005 WA produced 93 million in sales, mostly Atlantic salmon and Pacific Oysters (reported form 194 farms) – I am not sure if any one knows the exact total number of facilities – there are different classes and reporting requirements. Ecology regulates, WDNR allows leasing and some sites, with permit renewals, may have monitoring requirements. There are many private fish farms that occur in interior areas, typically using tanks or ponds – but the large-scale salt-water species, of course are within the Sound.
    In my own review several years ago, the expense of operating in Puget Sound for new businesses, or expanding existing, was a little cost-prohibitive (siting limitations and permitting requirements) – so much of the Sound/Salish Sea finfish aquaculture is in British Columbia. The nutrient -rich marine environment are better growing conditions for species that can live in salt water than in their freshwater phases.

    Monitoring occurs throughout the Sound with different entities NOAA, Ecology, Counties, but intensive monitoring of netpen sites are associated with studies, permit requirements, evalautions, or are coincidental to their location being associated with randomly-selected or established water monitoring sites.

  • Anne Mosness:

    Industrial aquaculture has been promoted as benign for so long that there is not the degree of independent scrutiny that the industry warrants, nor is information always easy to obtain.

    According to the Wa. Dept of Fish and Wildlife, there are 8 active net pen sites in state marine waters. The new owner of these operations, American Gold Seafoods, states on their website that they operate “two hatcheries near Rochester Washington and has 120 pens off Bainbridge Island, Port Angeles, Cypress Island and Hope Island”.

    People from private industry have gotten into positions within agencies or elected office to promote feedlot production of fish and shellfish. Dan Swecker, owner of the nineth salmon farm license in Washington described himself in an article on the front page of the Seattle PI as a fish farmer first and a state senator second. ( http://www.seattlepi.com/local/187486_fish19.html). The manager of NOAA’s Aquaculture Program is Michael Rubino, formerly “CEO of Bluewaters, Inc., an aquaculture R&D company, and a partner in Palmetto Aquaculture, a shrimp farm in South Carolina”. ( http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/what/bios/)

    NOAA is promoting in congress legislation that would allow open cage fish farming in our Exclusive Economic Zone, three to 200 miles off our shoreline. NOAA has also published “Washington Aquaculture Opportunities for Growth” promoting ‘shellfish production… new finfish species such as blackcod… culture of salmon and steelhead…open ocean aquaculture in the Strait of Juan de Fuca…”.

    Salmon reared in open cages in BC, Chile and Washington are Atlantic salmon and are considered invasive or a nuisance species by other West Coast states. Atlantic salmon are listed as one of the “100 Most Dangerous Invaders to Keep Out of Oregon.” Alaska has a ban on finfish farming. In 2003, California passed legislation which prohibits spawning, incubating, or cultivating anadromous or transgenic fish species, or any exotic species of finfish in waters of the Pacific Ocean that are regulated by the state. ( http://www.aquaticnuisance.org/fact-sheets/atlantic-salmon)

    Sealice amplified in salmon farms are killing wild salmon in BC and other fish farming regions. Pathogens such as infectious salmon anemia are also amplified in crowded cages and infect nearby and migratory wild fish. Ongoing escapes of nonnative, carnivorous Atlantic salmon pose risk to wild fish since they feed on juveniles in rivers and the marine environment. More than 613,000 Atlantic salmon were recorded as escaping in 4 years into Puget Sound (1996-99), then zero escapes were reported in the next several years even though Atlantic salmon continued to be caught in commercial and recreational fisheries.

    Scientists calculate that a salmon farm of 200,000 fish releases as much fecal solids per day as 62,595 people ( Hardy, Ronald. 2000, Aquaculture Magazine Nov/Dec 2000). Dr. Arthur Whiteley, Professor Emeritus of the U of W calculated that the farms across from Seattle allow 5.2 million pounds of untreated, unsterile fecal solids to flush into Puget Sound annually. Whiteley also calculated that the residents of Seattle paid $536 millions dollars to build a sewage treatment plant and $80 million annually to maintain it, yet the fish farm industry pays nothing for disposal of voluminous amounts of fish waste.

    Cleaning up Puget Sound is our obligation and most citizens and businesses are making changes in their lives and practices, yet we learned from Martha Baskin’s report that the salmon farms south of Bainbridge Island are planning to expand by 50%. They have applied to move across Rich Passage to a shallower location, Clam Bay, with increased nutrification and attraction of sea lions posing risks to wild salmon returning to creeks in the Bay.

    The likelihoood of predators, diseases and parasites causing harm to wild species is very serious. Neil Frazer, professor at the University of Hawaii said “The main problem with sea-cage farming of finfish is that when practiced on the industrial scale that operator claim to require in order to make a profit, it eventually destroys surrounding wild stock…. Nature has an effectively inexhaustible supply of diseases”.

    Citizens concerned with NOAA plans to allow open cages as close as three miles to our coastline and salmon bearing rivers should contact our elected officials and ask that they oppose hr 4363 and support Sen. David Vitter’s bill, S 3417. This bill would delay the push to put fish farms in our coastal waters by 3.5years and require research on impacts on wild species and ecosystems. ( http://vitter.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRo).

    Turning Puget Sound from a conservation estuary into a production region is alarming. Evidence is becoming more widely available about impacts of finfish farming and industrial scale shellfish growing that uses tons of plastics, destroys fish habitat and removes/kills native species. More information is available at several websites:
    Sierra Club http://washington.sierraclub.org/tatoosh/Aquaculture/index.a
    Protect Our Shoreline http://www.protectourshoreline.org/
    Case Inlet Shoreline http://www.protectourshoreline.org/
    Coalition to Protect Puget Sound Habitat http://www.coalitiontoprotectpugetsoundhabitat.com/