It has been made crystal clear by state officials on numerous occasions that the city has no authority to enact this ban. What law would the police cite if they charged somebody for breaking this law? What programs should be cut in order to defend the city from the inevitable lawsuit? These are the questions Seattle taxpayers should be asking.
as long as the guns and owners are legal I'm fine with them having them. if they have a permit why not permit them? we already know thugs are going to carry them but nobody seems concerned about stopping them.
The "Mayor" is simply an idiot that is going to cost the city of Seattle in tourist revenue, not to mention on the money gun owners are going to win in lawusits over this unconstitutional ban.
How many officers are going to get sued enforcing this blatanly unconstitutional wet dream of this ignorant politician. Jesus H. Christ, how did this moron get elected, and why hasn't he been removed for being an asshat?
Please arrest me for carrying contrary to this ban, and I will own your ass. Let's see: Unlawful arrest, harrasment under color of law, civil rights violations, false imprisonment, etc. etc. etc.
Do you know how many new guns I am going to buy? Keep up the good work Mayor.
Even if 65% of the 1098 comments were from out-of-town and all 44 of the positive comments were from Seattle, that would still mean that over 88% of the comments from people in Seattle were opposed to the gun ban.
From the comments of the two candidates for mayor, I have little hope that they will reverse the mayor's course of action. I am not a resident of Seattle, but I do own property there. As an Eastside resident, I frequent Seattle, and I have worked there multiple times.
The state pre-emption law on municipalities is quite clear in these matters. The one court case that the city has cited in its support provides only the most dubious connection to the situation at hand.
Do the citizens of Seattle really want their tax dollars spent on defending an executive order or ordinance that is, on its face, contrary to state law?
My decision now is whether to lessen my time in Seattle, or to simply ignore the ban.
The Mayor is a lame duck. His ban is a violation of State law according to the Attorney General, the city's attorney, and representatives of the city's police union. What purpose will be served by the Mayor imposing such an unenforceable ban?
Mayor Nickles' behavior begs the question, what does he have planned upon leaving office? Does he expect a nice, well-paid position with New York Mayor Bloomberg's euphemistically named group, Mayors Against Illegal Guns? Perhaps he's currying favor for a position with another national or state anti-gun organization. The one certainty is that he's demonstrating a complete disregard and lack of respect for the citizens of Seattle. So, what ulterior motive is guiding him?
The gun ban is nonsense and will not stand up to legal scrutiny. I wish the city would voluntarily abolish the ban now so they won't have to use tax dollars defending it in court later.