Update: Homeless protesters to move on to Burgess’ home

Protesters lay down bedding near Mayor Greg Nickels’ home Monday night. (Photo: Elliot Stoller)

Update: The homeless protesters who slept in front on Mayor Greg Nickels house Monday night say they’ll move on to City Councilman Tim Burgess’ Queen Anne home Tuesday night.

The group is protesting the city’s denial of funding for bus vouchers the homeless say they need to get from shelters and tent cities to downtown services. The group has vowed to protest in front of the homes of all council members except Nick Licata, who pushed for $50,000 to fund the vouchers.

Burgess may be a particular target. He is working on anti-panhandling legislation.

Burgess said in an email that he knows of the protest Tuesday night. He said he’ll be home and will have “a nice chat” with the protesters.

Monday night:

About 40 protesters appeared to have bedded down for the night on the quiet West Seattle street where Mayor Greg Nickels lives.

Earlier in the evening, at about 8:30 p.m, the homeless men and women — protesting the city’s denial of funding for bus vouchers — had walked through the neighborhood in the drizzle. Once at Nickels’ street, they laid out the tarps and mats they’d carried on the grassy parking strip.

Nickels, though, has a flower bed in front of his house, preventing the protesters from actually sleeping in front of his home. The protesters were actually in front of four of Nickels’ neighbors’ houses.

In Nickels’ home, the lights in the main room facing the street were out. But the lights were on in a side window behind drawn blinds.

The protest was going on without incident Monday night. Several police officers stood by, while most of the protesters lay on their bedding. The most action came from the TV crews conducting interviews.

The protesters plan to sleep Tuesday night in front of a City Council member’s home.

Protesters prepare to walk to Mayor Greg Nickels home Monday evening.(West Seattle blog)


Original story

The homeless are getting caught in the midst of these tough times that’s led Seattle to cut its budget and Metro to raise fares several times recently to deal with its own funding problems.

And that’s leading to a confrontation. A group of homeless people from the organization SHARE say they’re planning to sleep on the sidewalk in front of Nickels’ home in West Seattle. And in turn, the group says the homeless will begin sleeping in front of the homes of pretty much all of the City Council members, as well.

At a private meeting Monday morning at SHARE’s offices to plan the protests, homeless people like Alan Francis, a resident of a SHARE transitional living shelter that provides worker training in South Seattle, said the group had sought $50,000 to pay for bus vouchers so people could get downtown for services and back to SHARE’s shelters and tent cities in neighborhoods like the University District and South Seattle.

 

Metro’s fare increases have tapped out the vouchers it already had, he said. “We can’t get to the shelters without them,” Fisher said of the vouchers.

The protest would be the beginning of what appears to be a busy week for homeless activists. Wednesday is the deadline for Nickelsville, a separate group of homeless people, to leave the encampment it created in a Port of Seattle park, also as a protest against more money not being spent to house the homeless.

Nickels on Friday laid out a budget proposal to fill the city’s $72 million budget hole, mainly relying of furloughing city workers, cutting some policy advisers and dipping into the city’s rainy day fund to preserve services.

However, Fisher and others Monday morning complained the city is shifting money from one fund to another to help the South Lake Union Streetcar, which is also running out of money. In addition, the city is creating a separate tax classification for Russell Investments to help bring the international investment firm from Tacoma to downtown Seattle.

That left the group incensed about the city’s priorities. “Maybe we should sleep on the SLUT,” said Joe Watson, a resident of a SHARE shelter in South Seattle, referring to the popular nickname for the streetcar.

“The politicians should be ashamed,” said Beatrice Frieberg, a resident of the transitional living shelter in South Seattle.

The group is a unique one, in that it has few staff and is run by the homeless people themselves. That allows it to run 15 shelters and the tent cities with less overhead. And it has done a credible enough of a job to be funded by the city and the United Way. In addition, Metro is giving the organization 16,000 vouchers for residents to use.

The city’s Department of Human Services did offer to give the organization the $50,000 for the vouchers, Fisher said, but only on the condition it promise to keep the shelters open for the rest of the year. However, Fisher said SHARE has its own budget deficit. It is hoping to raise enough at its upcoming fundraiser to break even. But in these tough times, the group felt it couldn’t guarantee being able to stay open.

As the newspaper Real Change reported, City Councilman Nick Licata — who the group says need not worry about having the protesters show up at his doorstep — proposed funding the organization. However, the proposal was dropped in budget negotiations between the council and Nickels’ office.

“They’re not in support of the poor empowering themselves,” Frieberg said.

Licata on Monday doubted the protest would make Nickels change his mind. He said there probably was a way to fund the organization so that people would be able to go to the shelters and not end up on downtown streets. But he said the majority of the council had other priorities.

However, Seattle human services director Alan Painter said the city has funded the organization for years, including $320,00 even in this year’s tight budget.

The city simply couldn’t afford another $50,000 on top of that, he said.

“At this moment, a whole lot of people – including my own staff – are feeling the crunch,” he said.

Godden told Real Change it was simply a budget issue. “Everybody asked for more this year. We can’t spend money we don’t have,” she told the newspaper.

On Monday, City Councilman Richard Conlin told the PostGlobe that council members looked at the proposal and thought “this doesn’t seem reasonable and we didn’t do it.”

He said, “The city doesn‘t do bus vouchers. King County does bus service. Why don‘t they ask King County?”

In addition, the city is already talking to suburban cities about how Seattle provides an unfair share of human services in the county, which leads people from other cities to come to Seattle to use its services. Paying for vouchers, Conlin said, would mean the city would be paying the bus fare for people from other cities like Bothell to come use Seattle services. “It was just a bizarre proposal,” Conlin said.

Ben Ericksen, a resident of a SHARE shelter in the University District, responded that SHARE thought Metro was already being generous in giving the group free vouchers.

The city bars people from sitting or sleeping on sidewalks during the day, but the ban isn’t in effect at night, the homeless activists said. The law also prohibits obstructing a sidewalk, but the activists said they believe they have the right to exercise free speech on a public sidewalk.

“It seems easier for the mayor to spend the $50,000 than to have protests and a media circus in front of his house,” Frieberg said.

Please support this writer’s work by going to our donate page. Please note how you’d like your donation used.

10 Responses to Update: Homeless protesters to move on to Burgess’ home

  • Michael:

    …and one reason I have a problem with “homeless advocates.” They seem to shoot themselves (and by association, the homeless that they’re “helping”) with these distasteful grandstanding tactics.

    It makes you wonder whether they might not be unable to get funding because they keep doing stuff like this, “Nickelsville,” etc., instead of having a couple of people who know how to work WITH the City and other agencies…?

  • Fed up:

    How counterproductive can this group get, harassing an outgoing Mayor?

    I have little sympathy with their handout demands. When 8 bleeding-heart-liberal Council members look you in the eye and say they’re not going to give you more money, that should be your clue to re-assess your tactics.

  • hmmmm:

    @1 & 2: You are right: They should hire a high price PR firm to get their message out. That is also what the civil right movement should have done, or the people that got you your weekend and 8 hour day.

    After all, convenience is a God given right in America. Reality is much too inconvenient.

  • James:

    At the budget hearings at the beginning of the year, SHARE put in a request for $50,000 to fill the budget gap left from 2008. The “Green Sheet” was in on time and the votes needed to pass it were garnered. Mayor Nickels made the “Green Sheet” disappear. SHARE didn’t get the monies needed, which has led us to this point. While I don’t support this particular action, I do support SHARE. SHARE provides the most shelter beds in King County and does it for half the cost or more than any other provider. Some bed nights cost upwards of $20 or more. SHARE does it for about $3.50 per bednight. While everyone argues over the politics of this thing, 500+ people will sleep safe tonight. When all else is said and done, Women In Black will not have to stand in front of city hall for those people. In the end that is all that matters.

  • educate yourself:

    “Nickelsville, a separate group of homeless people, …encampment it created in a Port of Seattle park, also as a protest against more money not being spent to house the homeless.”
    This statement from the original article is incorrect.

    Nickelsville is NOT primarily a protest about the funding of services for the homeless. The Nickelodeans are acutely aware of the current economic reality. Public entities are cutting their budgets. Individuals are cutting their budgets. Everyone is making do with less.

    Nickelsville’s objective is really very simple and straight forward. They want to simply be allowed to use (NOT acquire ownership of) a piece of land for housing the homeless, until enough permanent affordable units become available. Through their own ingenuity they will construct simple structures to shelter themselves. They are NOT asking anyone to GIVE them a piece of land. They are not asking to be provided with any services at public expense. They cover all their costs through private donations.

    This seems to me to be a very pragmatic solution to a very real situation. Why not let them use some vacant parcel of land? How about one of those county parks that are due to be closed? That would even save public money. No need for building a fence and other costs of mothballing a park.

  • bill:

    I wonder when people are getting sick from having no place to sleep at will Nickels say it is a “publicity stunt.”

  • Scott Sands:

    I was also at the Mayor’s house covering the story my independent site, CoJourn.net. In it you can find SHARE’s and homeless’ responses to the some of the criticisms here and other sites.
    Although the piece relays their points of view, it is not meant to be biased on their behalf. All comments, critisms, and questions are welcomed and encouraged.
    http://cojourn.net/wordpress
    Thank you Kerry for the link.

  • Ivy Rose Nightscales:

    Any society that can deny food and shelter to anyone is on a downward slide to disaster. The $50,000 is a pittance.
    One rule for the super rich and another for everyone else.

    For those that oppose – try losing your jobs/income/savings/home/
    support networks/ etc. and surviving on your own.

    Try having compassion for the afflicted/addicted. Many have died on the streets. Do we need any more to die?

  • D Kramer:

    The most terrible thing about the protest is the way those staying at any share Shelter or those wanting to come stay at one are being told it is camp out for the direct action or get out.

    Seattle paid this shelter system 300,000 dollars this year and does not a thing to prevent this violation of basic civil and constitutional rights in regards to those who may choose not to do this protest. So I am guessing the city council people must enjoy the company outside their homes.

    No other landlord in the world can make its tenants protest against the very city providing the bulk of the funding for the place or get out – unless the residents are shelter residents in Seattle staying with SHARE. This protest is not being run in a truely consentual manner.

    Those who want to do this protest should have the right to. Those who do not should have equal right to not have to and still keep their shelter. Seattle please stop funding any organization that violates the rights of the people it claims to serve.

    Right now the city finds itself in a terrible financial jam. And there are a growing number of homeless people needing shelter. No matter what you may read in the press that the recession is ending – don’t believe the bull.

    How about the city of Seattle give some major tax breaks to the owners of some of these huge warehouses that sit empty if they help with providing the use of their building for a few months at a time as temporary shelters? Some say they don’t want a tent city in their backyard – okay how about in an industrial area then and have the people inside where you don’t have to see them and they can stay warm and dry?

    Doesn’t it make sense to encourage people to feel inspired to let those in need use the building resources that are already there and sitting vacant? Then the churches and city could help with utilties for inside space and decrease the chances of people freezing.

    What if we helped the homeless and helped a business at the same time.. It is time for people to sit down and talk about creative solutions that are not just handouts and that do not permit the violation of any homeless person’s basic rights as citizens.

    You know some of the homeless want to work and just can’t find jobs – if you happen to have any odd around the house or around the business work that you would rather just pay someone else to do – why not hire someone who really really needs the work? Maybe you could hire someone for a day to get that yard really looking fantastic and pay them enough to buy their own monthly $2 zone bus pass? Helping yourself while helping another! This is how we can at least help one person here and there..

    The number for Tent City 4 is 206-618-3901
    The number for Tent City 3 is 206-399-0412

    Now those at Tent City 4 have been Id checked and have been checked for outstanding warrants and sex offender status – unlike those at Tent City 3- but you can possibly find someone to hire to help you out today at a reasonable rate… I have met some pretty wonderful people who sure would love to have the chance to earn a days wages if given half a chance..

    And it won’t be a handout. Let the homeless show you they are just trying to make it like just like you would in their position!! Don’t assume you know what all homeless people are like – you just might be amazed at who might be homeless these days..

    Also feel free to donate to both tent cities – good quality interview clothes for both genders that you might not be using – blankets – non-used camping equipement – good quality shoes (FYI Tent city 4 at the Holy Spirit Lutheran Church in Kirkland has a lady who could really use a pair or two of ladies size 14 shoes.

    Your donation today could directly help a person tonight and you can get a tax write off as well!

  • D Kramer:

    I do not support this forced protest by SHARE aka Scott Morrow.

    However, I just wanted to share a story with you all about the power of bus tickets.

    I met this beautiful older African American woman at the Woman’s Wellness center who was staying at an inside actual bed shelter. She was doing her hair and nails and was very stressed out about an upcoming job interview. I asked her what was up and she shared with me how badly she just wanted to get to work again and yet she was having such a hard time getting anyone to help her with bus tickets to even get to the job interview. I referred her to the HIP project ( Homeless Intervention Project) figuring surely with her having solid job interview set up they would help her get there.

    The case manager gave her a form to apply for reduced fare bus pass due to her age/health but gave no help with actual tickets to the interview. The disabled senior bus pass costs a mere $3 with a monthly Orcas bus fare of just $9 and yet she could find no one to help her with this fare to get a job to get out of homelessness.

    The day before the interview when no one had helped her – I made my investment in this woman. I knew in this economy the chances that she would land the job when she had only one interview in God only knows how long was slim – but I felt damn it she wants to work so much – she deserves this break. I covered her bus fair to and from the interview myself telling her if she gets the job she owe me a Starbucks venti Vanilla Latte and some serious prayers.

    I have a latte coming and someone is praying for me now – Guess who landed that job! Damn that was a good investment.

    But no one would help this woman get to the interview. A woman who wanted to get a job faced an inability to get there – but she had foodstamps.. Let us help those who want to work get to those jobs!! She had been on the verge of selling her food stamps to get bus fair to be able to get to a job interview.

    Just 2 bus fares helped this woman be able to help herself better. Sure the job is at mimimum wage and is only part time – but I wish you could all see how much happier she looks when I see her the working woman now!

    SHARE’s violation of the rights of privacy, freedom of speech, freedom of relgion and freedom of political philosophy of its residents to include myself is not right and should be stopped.

    But people bus fair is vital in helping homeless people no longer be homeless! Let us help people get working!

    What if those on foodstamps who had no jobs were given a bus pass as part of their good stamps so they could find work sooner and get off the food stamps sooner?? Or what if those on food stamps were given the option to have their food stamps reduced by the amount of the monthly pass they needed to get a job to get off the food stamps? It is time for solutions that help people get it done.

    No one should have to sell their food stamps to pay SHARE for mandated summer donations to raise money/ donations for their Fall Harvest and no one should have to sell their food stamps in order to get to a job interview.