posted 07/14/09 03:15 PM | updated 07/14/09 03:25 PM

Coalition assails McGinn for disinformation about the Viaduct. McGinn claims victory

The dueling spin over the replacement of the Alaskan Way Viaduct with a tunnel  took another turn Tuesday morning, when supporters held a press conference calling out Mayoral candidate Mike McGinn and City Council candidate Mike O’Brien for spreading disinformation about the tunnel project.

At a press conference at the Ivar’s downtown, supporters like State Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Wells; Dave Gering, executive director of the Manufacturing Industrial Council of Seattle; and Dave Freiboth, executive director of the Martin Luther King County Labor Council, took exception in particular with McGinn and O’Brien’s repeated remarks during the campaigns that the tunnel will cost $4.2 billion instead of the actual $1.9 billion pricetag for the tunnel alone.

They cited, for instance, a poll of 1,000 voters run by McGinn. As the local political site Publicola reported, respondents were asked:

“The city of Seattle and state of Washington plan to build a four-point-two billion dollar deep bore tunnel under downtown Seattle to replace the Alaskan Way viaduct in 2016.

“Do you support or oppose the tunnel plan?”

Gering termed the survey a “push poll,” a type of poll in which the intent is less to seek answers than to spread disinformation about a candidate or an issue. McGinn denies it was a push poll, saying it was intended to try out different messages to use on the stump.

McGinn prefers using the city’s $930 million contribution to the project on other transportation projects like transit and building sidewalks.

The group, which worked last legislative session to bring about the political compromise that led to the tunnel deal, also cited posts on McGinn’s campaign blog. For instance, he wrote about the poll: “The voters of Seattle are speaking clearly. They want a mayor who understands the $4.2 billion tunnel is a boondoggle.”

However, a close look found there’s a little misinformation all around.

Although the entire project is, indeed, $4.2 billion, that figure includes making improvements to Alaskan Way, replacing the deteriorating seawall and improving transit. The tunnel portion of the project only costs $1.9 million.

And though the plan was put into place, coalition members worried the campaign statements -- and the perception the tunnel portion will cost more than it actually will -- could lead to complications.

  Vlad Oustimovitch, an architect and former member of one of Seattle’s design review boards, said,  ”nothing is ever settled in Seattle.”

Ivar’s president Bob Donegan also noted that while the county, the port and Seattle have committed to their shares of funding the project, they haven’t ponied up the money yet.

And indeed McGinn has said that if he were mayor, he’d do whatever was necessary to make sure the viaduct doesn’t get the property permits or city approvals to be built.

McGinn, reached after the press conference, seized on the fact the coalition felt a need to hold a press conference in the first place. “This is not a done deal,” he said, meaning that voters who may have thought it was useless voting for him because the viaduct was going to happen anyway, now have reason to think the project can be stopped. “This is not a done deal. This is why we hold elections.”

Of using the larger $4.2 billion figure, McGinn said, “my house is worth considerably less than that. But the value of my house is also the land that it sits on.”

Coalition members said the press conference was less designed to push a particular candidate than to set the record straight. Indeed, speakers at the press conference were split between mayoral candidates Mayor Greg Nickels and City Councilwoman Jan Drago, both tunnel supporters. Gering has donated $250 to Nickels campaign, according to city elections records.

Kohl-Wells has donated $200 to Drago’s campaign. Oustimovitch has donated $50 to Drago’s campaign.

Save and Share this article
Tags:
If it's a done deal then why do you need to hold a press conference?
Because it's not a done deal; and the politicians that made the backdoor deals to reach the tunnel agreement are starting to get scared now that the public is realizing what a poor decision they've made. Sure, it's "only" ~$2 billion for the actual tunnel, but that's barely less than the entire surface+transit proposal that SDOT and WSDOT vetted for an entire year only to conclude that it would work. So why are we paying billions more for a tunnel that's wrong for both our fiscal and environmental future? I have no idea, and we should all thank McGinn and O'Brien for making us take a real hard look at this decision. Actually, McGinn and O'Brien should thank the folks who held this press conference, nice work throwing gasoline on the fire.
Comment by Stacy
July 14, 2009
( 0 votes)
Question:
With only 2% of the design work done on the mega tunnel project, how can anybody say that their estimates will be accurate or that cost overruns will be controllable?

I seriously don't understand why we are being told the tunnel is a sensible idea. It is a huge undertaking to build the largest diameter tunnel ever attempted, and do it in unpredictable soils under downtown buildings. And for what? To move only a portion of the cars that the viaduct holds?
Comment by Becky
July 15, 2009
( 0 votes)
The Deep-bore is a bad deal...
When voters rejected the "6-lane" Cut-n-Cover Tunnel option in March 2007, this spooked Seattle's entire business community, not just the Waterfront District businesses, that there would be too much construction disruption for the Waterfront to survive.

However, WsDOT soon revised the Cut-n-Cover Tunnel with a "4-lane" version which entails much less construction disruption, mostly because SR-99 can remain in place up until the last year or so for constructing the Lower Belltown segment. Traffic then is diverted via Broad Street and a probably permanent (and desirable) bridge over the railroad tracks onto Alaskan Way, and then enters the completed tunnel portal at Pike. Rebuilding the seawall is mostly complete as many parts of the sidewalk.

The trench is dug in 2-block segments starting from the south end. Traffic is divered around the trench, under the AWV and returned to the surface above completed tunnel segments. Excavation debris is removed via the tunnel to the south.

The 4-lane Cut-n-Cover Tunnel maintains the Elliott/Western access to Ballard-bound traffic, about 40,000 vehicles daily, or "2500 per hour" that is otherwise directed onto the new Alaskan Way with 15-20 stoplights. Even half that much additional traffic will produce bumper-to-bumper gridlock there all day long.

The concern about this much traffic on the new Alaskan Way must be addressed in public hearings. SDOT is sticking it to Seattle residents and visitors by accepting the Deep-bore tunnel's guarantee of another layer of gridlock, like everywhere else downtown.
Comment by Art
July 15, 2009
( 0 votes)
Here's hoping it's not a done deal
With any luck, Big Dig Jr. will never be built, and those who need to use the Alaskan Way viaduct will continue to be able to use it as long as people are driving. If it falls down in an earthquake then a few condo owners will have won their lotto, but in advance of that I say this tunnel is a huge mistake. Also, you folks overlooking Hwy 99 now better sell fast if it comes down, because some a-hole is going to build a view-blocking eyesore directly in front of you post haste.

Disclosure: I live in Magnolia and will be hugely impacted by the destruction of the viaduct. Alaskan Way itself is already ridiculous at rush hour and there is no possibility of that road handling the necessary traffic volume, regardless of the amount the city and state say they'll spend on it. Condo owners/mayors/governors with interests on the waterfront who were waiting for their property values to skyrocket can kiss my white a**. The viaduct was there when you bought your overpriced postage stamp and by God it will be there when you sell it.
Comment by Raul
July 16, 2009
( 0 votes)
Push Poll
I received one of the push polls. No doubt about it. McGinn has lost my vote.
Comment by doug
July 23, 2009
( 0 votes)
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: