posted 07/07/09 05:45 PM | updated 07/08/09 10:36 AM

New: City Light superintendent's bonus was much more than he'd received before

The $40,000 bonus City Light Superintendent Jorge Carrasco received from Seattle was several times larger than others he’d received in previous years and hit the maximum called for in his contract, even as the utility faces financial problems, Mayor Greg Nickels’ spokesman said.

 

Carrasco’s contract, signed when he took the post in 2004, calls for him to receive up to an 8 percent performance bonus each year, and a 10 percent retention bonus if he stayed at City Light for four years, said Nickels spokesman Alex Fryer.

Carrasco received about a 2.2 percent increase in 2005 and 2006, which came to a total of about $10,000 in bonuses, Fryer said.

He received no bonus in 2007.

But as the PostGlobe first reported on Tuesday, Carrasco received a $40,000 bonus about a month ago. That was made up of the 10 percent retention bonus plus the full 8 percent performance bonus he could receive, the highest he's received while in office.

“This is no time to be awarding bonuses to city employees who are already highly paid. Forty thousand dollars is more than many families earn in an entire year,” City Councilwoman and mayoral candidate Jan Drago said on Tuesday.

“I understand there is a need to pay competitive salaries for highly valued executives," Drago said, "but the city must show restraint during tough economic times like these.”

Fryer said Carrasco had done much to improve the financial performance of City Light during his tenure – a fact supported by the City Council’s unanimous decision last year to reconfirm him for another four year term.

However, the timing is somewhat surprising that Nickels’ decision to grant him the maximum bonus comes during a year when the utility is facing a major budget shortfall.

The utility, which like other electric companies sells and buys its power to other utilities, was hit when natural gas prices dropped by roughly a third. The result: City Light expects to make $79 million in energy sales, about $90 million less than the $169 million it estimated.

Though at Nickels’ direction, the city held the line on rates this year, City Light is considering a number of measures and City Council members are creating an advisory board to examine what step should be taken, including raising rates.

Additionally, in order to not raise rates this year, the utility is cutting $21 million in its operations and maintenance budget and its capital improvement program by $43 million.

A statement from Nickels in April acknowledged, “Effects of these cuts include longer times to complete electrical service connections and street light repairs, and longer wait times at the utility’s call center.”

About two months later, Carrasco received a larger bonus than in previous years.

Fryer said City Light “is in a stable financial condition and its tough to find good managers to run big public utilities. Remember (City Light’s) budget is just under $1 billion. Regardless of what’s happening in the larger energy market, Jorge has a proven track record of accomplishment.”

“This is no time to be awarding bonuses to city employees who are already highly paid.  $40,000 is more than many families earn in an entire year,” City Councilwoman and mayoral candidate Jan Drago said on Tuesday. 

“I understand there is a need to pay competitive salaries for highly valued executives," Drago said, "but the city must show restraint during tough economic times like these.”

Bruce Harrell, chairman of the City Council’s utilities committee, said, “I fully understand why people question (the bonus) at a time of declining revenue, and furloughs for county and city staff. But on the other hand, this is a time when we need to retain strong leadership (at City Light).”

However, the issue moved to the arena of the current mayoral campaign when James Donaldson, the former Sonic running for office, released a statement saying that he was “outraged” by the bonus.

Donaldson said, “Mayor Nickels has his priorities all screwed up. This is a mayor who gave employees in four departments an unpaid furlough. This is a mayor who cut back library hours at a time when citizens are cutting back entertainment and camps for their children. This is a mayor who pulled garbage cans out of the parks throughout the City in order to save $180,000. This is a mayor who continues to look out for those of means, those who already have, and kick sand in the face of the little guy.”

Still, on Monday, Fryer said Carrasco has made a number of improvements during his tenure. Indeed City Council members unanimously voted to reconfirm Carrasco to a second four-year term last year.

City Council President Richard Conlin’s newsletter said at the time, “Councilmember Bruce Harrell led a thorough review of City Light and the Superintendent’s performance, and concluded that most of the Council’s program had been implemented successfully, and that City Light management had improved, although there are several outstanding policy issues that are still pending completion.  The Council agreed with Councilmember Harrell that the utility was making satisfactory progress under Superintendent Carrasco, and unanimously agreed to the reappointment.”

Before the most recent budget crunch, Fryer said Carrasco had make a number of moves to improve a utility that was hammered when electricity prices soared early this decade. City task forces found that the utility was not equipped to handle the situation, forcing it to buy energy by borrowing money and raising rates by 60 percent.

A City Light report supplied by Fryer said the utility has taken a more fiscally conservative approach under Carrasco. It has paid off its loans, and resolving not to borrow any more money. The moves restored its Standard & Poor’s credit rating to A+, and the utility lowered rates in 2007 by 8.4 percent and by an average of 5 percent over the last five years.

Save and Share this article
Tags: Carrasco, City, Light, bonus
Carrasco
Just to give this a little perspective. The bonus rewards Carrasco for performance through last year. It seems unlikely he could get a bonus based on this year's performance which finds (as Keri reported) that revenues from wholesale energy are much lower than projected. Carrasco's salary (as reported on KING) is also lower than other comparable public utility directors. Maybe it's a contract more heavily dependent on incentives and if so, that's not necessarily a bad thing.
Comment by Mikos
8 months ago
( 0 votes)
City Light Superintendent gets bonus
I am fuming! The middle 2 of 4 lights are out on our street - leaving our street in the dark for over three months. During that time there have been car and house break-ins. Coincidence? Neighbors have called to receive the same lame excuses. A "joke" is going around about how many City Light employees it takes to change a light bulb - fill in your own punch line. Seems like the joke is on the customers of City Light. How many street lights would $40k repair? If Carrasco has half of a conscience he will return the bonus and get street lights repaired and return safety to the streets.
Comment by darkstreets
8 months ago
( 0 votes)
Meter reader laid off, savings go to Carrasco's wallet
My partner was, until 2 weeks ago, a meter reader for Seattle City Light. Including her benefits, she made less than $40,000. Her managers told her that she was one of the best meter readers at City Light, walking 5-7 miles each day, reading up to 1,000 units on a shift, and generating hundreds of thousands of dollars for this publicly-owned utility. Unfortunately, as one of the last hired, she was one of the first to be laid off to save the utility money.

Now we know where those savings are going -- right into Carrasco's wallet.
Comment by Interbay
8 months ago
( 0 votes)
Bonus
I can't believe what I am reading! A bonus for a public employee while the bottom of the heap (public employees) are forced to take days off without pay to help this bloated government balance the books? If this man accepts one penny for a bonus, he should be bounced out. His bonus is almost twice what I make in a year, and I live a good life and pay my bills. What is wrong with this picture? I am outraged at the greed in our upper level governmental employees!
Comment by Candace Lange
8 months ago
( 0 votes)
48 days to fix a light bulb
http://seattlepostglobe.org/2009/05/27/let-there-be-light-ma

I serve on Seattle's Pedestrian Advisory Board ( http://seattle.gov/spab) and have been closely watching and trying to fix the city's streetlight situation for maybe 2 years now. The backlog is so big now that City Light won't quantify it. I'd estimate 10-20% of Seattle's streetlights are out now. Ten years ago, they got fixed in 48 hours (thus Nickels' goal of a 10 day repair time doesn't impress me), and an official claimed that last summer they were averaging under 24 hours (I'm skeptical). More recently, SCL's website ( http://seattle.gov/light/streetlight) and phone line (206.684.7056) claimed it took 3-5 business days, then 4-8 weeks, then "several months" to fix reported outages. Until giving up recently, I kept a spreadsheet of streetlight outages and how long they took to get fixed. The worst one, at Broadway & Olive, took 14 or 15 months. I have several others that have been out for over 6 months despite multiple complaints. And last fall an SCL spokesman claimed to the press that only 345 lights were out in Seattle, when the real figure was probably at least 10 times that. Even Sound Transit, SPD, and the Capitol Hill business group have had trouble getting responses on needed lighting, let alone getting it added.

As the list of concerned parties suggests, street lighting is important not only for safety and crime deterrence, but for commerce (shop owners know more people will walk in front of their store if it's not dark and scary) and encouraging people to walk rather than drive. I don't think City Light has any real handle on how big the problem is, and this year's budget cuts seem to have undermined all the progress I thought we'd made over the previous year or so. So, to say the least, I find Carrasco's bonus outrageous. That money could be used to put another worker on the streetlight repair problem, or to add needed light to several dark streets.
Comment by Jon Morgan
8 months ago
( 0 votes)
Carrasco
It does seem that Nickels allegiance is greater to city employees than to the tax paying public. I wonder if that is due to a life time of public employment. It is increasingly dangerous to be a pedestrian or bikerider in this city. Bicyclists need better pavement than cars and pedestrians need lights and sidewalks. the city is not maintaining either. The rhetoric and the reality of this adminstration just don't add up.
Comment by Mikos
8 months ago
( 0 votes)
street lights
Here's a story we did on the street lights issue. I don't think anyone else in town did it.

http://seattlepostglobe.org/2009/05/27/let-there-be-light-ma

Here's a story I did on the issue last year when I was still at the P-I
http://www.seattlepi.com/local/354269_streetlights08.html
Comment by kery murakami
8 months ago
( 0 votes)
Streets and sidewalks
As a biker and walker it is hard to listen to the city encourage me to not drive as I navigate sidewalks that are falling apart and still not ADA compliant and main streets in the city - for instance Jackson, MLK and 23rd ave which are in such disrepair they are dangerous even on a mountain bike.
Comment by CentralAreaGuy
8 months ago
( 0 votes)
Job share
Fryer said City Light “is in a stable financial condition and its tough to find good managers...".

All they have to do is raise the rate you pay for electricity and, yes, they are now stable.

If 3 people share this job, no meetings would be missed, it would be staffed 365/7 all year long, plus each one would have a good working salary and benefits.

When will we cut up some of these 6 figure income jobs to more than one person?
Comment by Ted Bundy
8 months ago
( 0 votes)
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: