posted 06/23/09 01:56 PM | updated 07/17/09 09:52 AM
Views: 1254 | Comments : 6 | Film

Film review: 'Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen'

PostGlobe film critic

Think of exposition as the lubricant between the mechanical action pieces of “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen,” the bigger, longer, more expensive and completely unnecessary sequel to the amusing 2007 blockbuster about giant alien robots that transform into cars and trucks while causing epic amounts of property damage. These robots are full of it.

Between such comic book-balloon lines as “Revenge is mine,” “You picked the wrong planet” and that old standby, “This isn’t over,” the mecha-aliens stop to explain that a) alien Autobots visited Earth a few thousand years before; b) a rogue Autobot known as The Fallen tried to destroy the Earth and was foiled by his robot buddies; and c) now he wants to destroy the Earth out of revenge for … not being allowed to destroy the Earth the first time. Or something like that. The Fallen and his signature henchman (henchbot?) Megatron (yes, he’s resurrected or recharged or whatever for this film) despise the human race, but it’s hard to make anything out of such circular logic, and the film just assumes the audience will go with it. When a fleet of military-grade giant robots is determined to destroy the planet Earth, who needs motivation? They could be doing it just because they can. Which I think is the same motivation Michael Bay has for spending a couple of hundred million dollars on a film based on a line of toys.

“Revenge of the Fallen” picks up a few years after the first “Transformers” movie. The Autobots (they’re the good guys) have teamed up with the American military on a strike team hunting down the last of the Decepticons (they’re the bad guys determined to kill the planet, out of spite, apparently) still lurking on Earth. The opening scene, in which all the mecha-aliens transform back and forth between giant robots and various makes of automobiles and heavy trucks, becomes so abstract it looks like a Jackson Pollock canvas in motion screeching through the middle of a Hollywood action movie.

advertisement

The human cast is represented in large part by Sam Witwicky (a buffed-up Shia LaBeouf, no longer the skinny nerd of the first film), who is now heading off to college, and his super-hot girlfriend Mikaela (Megan Fox), stuck in her dad’s garage where she works in cutoffs and halter tops and strikes poses that would look right at home on a pinup calendar. Soldier boys Josh Duhamel and Tyrese Gibson have even less character development than the supporting cast of computer-generated machines, and sniveling meddler John Benjamin Hickey is little more than a stand-in for bureaucratic incompetence.

You can pay attention to all that exposition, which for a time turns the film into a heavy-metal version of “The Da Vinci Code” that sends Sam, Mikaela and former Agent Simmons (John Turturro), who now works at a deli counter and runs a conspiracy Web site, to Egypt on the trail of obscure clues and ancient ruins. But mostly the film is about big, loud and increasingly incomprehensible action scenes of massive mechanical creations pummeling the living grit out of one another and destroying the ancient ruins of Egypt while in the grip of an ancient blood feud (or would that be a transmission fluid and engine grease feud?). The digital effects aren’t limited to careening metal and exploding pyramids, however. They surely enhanced Megan Fox, making her skin duskier, her lips a brighter red, her eyes more piercing blue and her teeth all but glow in the dark while roughing it in the Egyptian desert, apparently enhancing everything except her cleavage, which by virtue of its central supporting role deserves its own screen credit.

Bay plays about half the film for goofball humor and half for melodramatic excess. The preview audience with which I saw the film seemed amused by most of it, but even they were moved to titters when Bay started to take it all too seriously, slowing the film down to let us worry over whether some central character was about to die. As if the film had the nerve to actually surprise anyone. Without any real stake in the story or the characters, it’s just a lot of vague noise and action distraction, an Erector Set Apocalypse that tries to dazzle audiences but merely pummels them into submission. At 150 minutes, that’s a long assault on the senses without so much as a story, a surprise or a convincing emotional response to show for it.

Directed by Michael Bay; screenwriters: Ehren Kruger, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman; featuring Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson, John Turturro, John Benjamin Hickey. Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi action violence, language, some crude and sexual material, and brief drug material. 150 minutes of digitally created robot action.

Save and Share this article
you suck as a critic
Wow you must never have been a kid or ever enjoyed the more simple fun things in life. Sorry this isn't a Oscar award winning drama for best picture. Its a movie based on toys and a comic book as well as cartoon show from the 80's. Hello this is meant to be fun to watch and exiting for the special effects and back story it tells. Hell Prime doesn't even really have a lot of plot armor like most action movies....wait you're probably now well enough versed in movie making to know what plot armor is....when is a news paper or tv show going to have a critic that likes to sit down and watch a movie for entertainment purposes instead of some one that is so stuffy and full of themselves. Dude if you tried to make a movie it would probably suck worse than anything a 6 year old could make with a handy cam. so stop being so serious and learn to enjoy the smaller things in life.
Comment by C.
7 months ago
( 0 votes)
HUMANS DON'T KILL TRANSFORMERS!
"Its a movie based on toys and a comic book as well as cartoon show from the 80's."

That's not an excuse. The producers of the original TV show did their best to suck that attitude out of the production and actually flesh out the characters. There was none of that in Revenge Of The Fallen.

First of all, this movie has very little basis in the comic books or the original cartoon show, so that's two strikes against your counter-argument. The cartoon show had character development, something Michael Bay doesn't know how to do.

In fact, I'll take one step further to say that Michael Bay didn't go far enough to sell the toys. Most of them went unnamed (if they mentioned even half of the characters by name, I never heard it!) and by the film's end, it still ended up being Michael Bay's macho military muscle-heads shooting at Decepticons, while the Autobots did little of anything.

Question: Who killed Devastator? Who ended up killing most of the Decepticons in the Egypt desert by simply carpet-bombing the place? After Prime died, who became the main focus of the movie? If you answered "stupid Marine jar-heads" to each of these questions, you win!

Can we have one Transformers movie that's actually about the robots and not about how much Michael Bay loves the US military? Is that possible, please?!

By the way, I'm glad I'm not the only person who noticed that the movie is basically a rip-off of The Da Vinci Code.
Comment by TV's Mr. Neil
7 months ago
( 0 votes)
"Transformers: Revenge of he Fallen"
Who cares?
Comment by nancyb
7 months ago
( 0 votes)
gee
this critic does not watch transformers when he was young. maybe he watched sailor moon or the powerpuff girls..hehe.. or maybe he just too old for it...
Comment by whomever i am
7 months ago
( 0 votes)
gee again
sorry for the grammar.. huhu..
Comment by wee
7 months ago
( 0 votes)
Countering the Trolls
Actually, I think the review is pretty spot on. Yeah, there's a lack of connection to the original cartoons but who really cares? Soundwave doesn't turn into a boombox. OH NOES!! MY LIFE IS OVER!!

For all his wordiness, the reviewer is right. This is a movie that's all over the place. It's like someone handed a 13 year old boy (back in 1985) a billion dollars and had him go make a movie. You've got lots and lots of transformers, including Devastator (OMG! The Constructicons! YES!), just about every piece of US Military hardware we have, pretty girls, and lots and lots of jokes about balls and butts and so forth. Which would be fine, but Bay can't figure out what kind of movie he's making. Is it a romance? An action film? A war movie? A slapstick comedy? It's all of them! Weeeee!

All in all though, was kind of fun romp. Climax was a bit of a let down. No epic battle or anything, Prime just comes up and whacks the bad guy. Game over. =P
Comment by Iceberg
7 months ago
( 0 votes)
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: